2. In September secondary carried 2007, school Estonia (10 - 12 forms) out by reference School Act. secondary schools to Estonian amended Decision background transferraed to Estonian Remarkably, would would reform of Russian no one of them supported 3. By the opinion teachers, criteria for their even planned, caru'iot time decisions dominate, were a decision place civics, in 2011: it was presented, and Upper radically and this Secondary new to what 10 parliamentarians if only as well prepared, were School Act, concerns of minority because that in the field and the opinions as Estonian its goals in the origin, monitoring Already no one understands of minority from what education of minorities methodologists are not obvious, the qualitative are not calculated. it was in Estonia that there if not in decision-making, July 1993, President Estonia made and literature, was to be effected School anything are not justified, minorities, minorities Lennart and themselves this it is clear are the criteria purely or their and the stages of the reform in Estonia, conference parties. between sides: 1) 5 members which brings and is not that it for this very political representatives are Union of National at the RT sessions - RT). different to Estonia. of ethnic population Parliament; At the beginning body, to the Statute, and stateless stability, dialogue The RT initially 2) 5 members population; the CSCE persons table In of of the RT is a residing in and mutual was comprised of the Representative and 3) 5 representatives Mission decisions. the Round part in the drafting According minorities groups. the Russian-speaking minorities. Active of involving and justi:tying Advisory Its goal is to promote of Estonian together a special (hereafter Mission experience at least in discussing convened of representatives and of political understanding Meri the CSCE was an interesting then on 10 July 1993 of the RT took standing the ignored. 4. Meanwhile, statute against and that in the first language grounds of minorities, and the resources It is obvious In 2007, the Law. evaluation success. national about is not methodically be successful, consistently This of representatives the reform of linguistic did not bring in 2000 as the 60 % requirement. The new Basic 2010, school. of transition upper - 2008. was executed be gradual, the Estonian to fulfil pedagogical pure political. as of 1 September like Completion be obliged no methodic, remain be subjects would language" the Government to transition, reform and Upper year 2007 Act. was / 2001. In 1997 year 2000 School Reform School of "other to academic Secondary of upper 2007). Basic 60 % of instruction unpreparedness and music. then that all schools affect school (Reform transition the transition will on the level of the former for academic and Upper minority geography decision School in Estonian the law in 1993, was planned of all too evident that Russian-speaking history, adopting to Estonipn to Basic to instruction provisions the law to put back that transition an amendment force After transition predominantly to respective Secondary Parliament launched was invited of three Assembly, of the to participate as an observer. Legal Information Centre for Human Rights Reg. No 80005922, J.K<jleri 8, Tallinn 10150, Estonia, phone: (372) 6464270, fax: (372) 6464272, E-mail: centre@llichr.ee, http://www.lichr.ee