103 234. In the answer to the application, the State “acquiesced” to the request made by the Inter-American Commission and the representatives “for the enactment and enforcement of legislation contemplating an effective and expedient remedy to solve conflicts of rights as those at issue in the instant case” (supra para. 203). 235. Based on the above and in view of the conclusions reached by the Court in the chapters relating to Articles 8, 21, 25 and 2 of the American Convention, the Court finds that the State shall guarantee the effective exercise of the rights contemplated in its Political Constitution and domestic legislation, pursuant to the American Convention. Consequently, the State shall, within a reasonable time, enact into its domestic legislation, as per Article 2 of the American Convention, the legislative, administrative and other measures necessary to provide an efficient mechanism to claim the ancestral lands of indigenous peoples enforcing their property rights and taking into consideration their customary law, values, practices and customs. e) Publication and disclosure of the pertinent parts of the Court’s Judgment 236. As ordered in prior cases,239 the Court finds that, as a measure of satisfaction, the State shall publish within one year as from the date notice of the instant Judgment be served and at least once, in the Official Gazette and in another national daily newspaper, the section entitled Proven Facts, without the footnotes, and operative paragraphs one to fourteen of the instant Judgment. Furthermore, the State shall finance the radio broadcasting240 of the content of paragraphs 73(1) to 73(75) of chapter VII on Proven Facts, without the footnotes, and of operative paragraphs one to fourteen of the instant Judgment, in the language indicated by the members of the Community, in a radio station accessible to them. Said radio broadcasting shall be made at least four times in two-week intervals. COSTS AND EXPENSES 237. As the Court has stated on previous occasions,241 costs and expenses are contemplated within the concept of reparations as enshrined in Article 63(1) of the American Convention, since the efforts of the victims and their representatives to obtain justice both at the domestic and the international levels lead to disbursements that must be compensated when international responsibility of the State is declared in a conviction judgment. With regard to their reimbursement, the Court must prudently assess their extent, which involve the expenses generated when acting before authorities within the domestic jurisdiction as well as those generated in the course of proceedings before the Inter-American human rights protection system, taking into account the particular circumstances of the specific case and the nature of the international jurisdiction for the protection of human rights. Such estimate may be made based on equitable grounds and in consideration of the expenses reported by the parties, provided their amount be reasonable. 239 Cf. Case of Acevedo-Jaramillo et al., supra note 3, para. 313; Case of López-Álvarez, supra note 3, para. 208; Case of the Pueblo Bello Massacre, supra note 3, para. 279. 240 Cf. . Case of Indigenous Community Yakye Axa, supra note 1, para. 227; and Case of Yatama, supra note 8, para. 253. 241 Cf. Case of Acevedo-Jaramillo et al., supra note 3, para. 315; Case of López-Álvarez, supra note 3, para. 214; Case of the Pueblo Bello Massacre, supra note 3, para. 283.