12
Chapter
REGIONAL ISSUES,
STANDARDS AND
MECHANISMS64
12.1 MINORITIES IN AFRICA
The ethnic composition of African States is
often highly pluralist. Minority status, especially
in terms of the non-dominance of particular
groups, can be difficult to determine. Indeed,
international criteria on minorities may not fully
reflect the complexity of multi-ethnic States
in Africa that are highly diversified in terms of
ethnicity, religion and language – sometimes
comprised of more than 250 different ethnic
groups, for example, in Nigeria or Cameroon.
In practice, some numerically smaller groups,
through alliances with other groups, may exert
political dominance. There are examples where
numerically large ethnic groups have not
achieved equal access to power. Furthermore,
the examples of the colonial and minority whiteruled States have given a negative connotation
to the term ‘minority’. The post-colonial efforts
to forge national unifying identities in African
States have meant that attention to specific
ethnic, religious and linguistic identities has
been downplayed in the public sphere, yet they
are relevant to power relations.
Another challenge in the African context is
that the distinction between minority groups
and indigenous peoples is not always clear.
Moreover, the concept of ‘indigenous’ is not
widely accepted, including by government
actors. Recognition as ‘indigenous’ may be contentious where groups are claiming land rights
and self-determination, rights that form part of
international standards on indigenous peoples.
Marginalised indigenous groups often adopt
alternative terms, such as ‘ethnic minorities’
or ‘indigenous minorities’ in order to initiate
dialogue with government on their concerns.
Forms of caste-based discrimination are reportedly found in Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia,
Kenya, Mali, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra
Leone, Somalia and possibly more.65 Affected
communities are said to include the Dime of
Ethiopia, the Osu of Nigeria and the Sab of
Somalia. According to a study by the former
UN Sub-Commission on Human Rights, such
groups face a number of common experiences, including the ascription of their status
by birth, their predominance in (and sometimes
restriction to) certain low-status and ‘polluted’
occupations (e.g. blacksmiths, leather workers,
sweepers, servants, entertainers), restrictions
on marrying outside their group, and a general
regard as being ‘impure’ peoples.66
Among the most common concerns for
minorities in Africa are participation, poverty,
and traditional lands and livelihoods. These three
concerns are closely connected. Because of their
marginalisation, many minorities do not have
opportunities to participate equally in planning
of poverty reduction strategies. Their communities and regions are often excluded from the
benefits of development programmes. In many
cases, the prescriptions for poverty reduction do
not take into account the particular traditional
This chapter was drafted by the Minority Rights Group International, as one of the members of the Task Force. However, the views expressed in this chapter do not necessarily
represents those of the UN, including UNDP, or their Member States. For up to date information on regional and other issues, visit: http://www.minorityrights.org/
64
International Dalit Solidarity Network, http://idsn.org/caste-discrimination/caste-exists-where/ (9 August 2009).
65
See UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/31 (5 July 2004) and Annex III, section 16 of this Guide.
66
Chapter 12: Regional Issues, Standards and Mechanisms
161