to ensure the protection of minority, religious identity, and to encourage conditions for the promotion of that identity. Furthermore, the Declaration recognises a wide approach for the protection of the rights of minorities that (…) of equality, non-discrimination, and all the spheres of life, participation in public life, and protection of existence. Moreover, in order to achieve this wider approach, the Declaration requires positive measures to be taken in the area of legislation policy and programming. Having said that, I would like to have just a short note on the traditional approach for the protection and promotion of the rights of minorities, which has been based on international standards, relating to freedom of religion and belief. The international law on freedom of religious includes three aspects: freedom of religion, pluralism within the religion, and equality and tolerance for non-adherents. This universal approach of international law, freedom on religion, requires universal applicability of religious human rights, which is used here to refer to those rights which (…) the freedom of belief and conscious, including religious dissent. Confirmative or (…) their tolerance as human rights. And regardless of the claim of specify of religious foundations of these rights, this is inevitable intention of exclusive nature of religious creeds. However, by protecting rights to dissent the religious human rights, norms, and mechanisms, the international human rights law, safe, and securing the rights of both adherents of orthodoxy and dissent and to formulate and articulate their own religious interpretation. The religious human rights norms reject the claim of the monopoly of religious authenticity and exclusivity of giving the only valuable formulation, articulation, and interpretation of religious texts. This is also of an almost importance as far as the harassment, intimidation, and persecution of religious minorities are consented. I will just say a few ways of the legal, political and social frameworks. The protection and implementation of both (…) and treaty human rights norms is dependent in the action of the state through its own legislative, judicial and executive organs. Although the (…) modern concept of the human rights is to restrict the executive power or the state to treat those who are subject to executive jurisdiction as it pleases paradoxically, it is the state which controls the means by which it is (…) is to be achieved. Although there are best practices, the existence of normative and institutional resources as it must be (…) in many countries have not effectively succeeded in securing and protecting the rights of religious minorities. And I thank you.