A/75/590
Palantir have proved essential in providing the technology that supports the detention
and deportation programmes run by United States Immigration and Customs
Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security, 13 raising justified concerns
of corporate complicity in human rights violations associated with these programmes.
It is not yet clear what data-sharing accountability mechanism will be in place during
the World Food Programme–Palantir partnership or whether data subjects will be able
to opt out. 14 Data collection is not an apolitical exercise, especially when powerful
Global North actors collect information on vulnerable populations with no regulated
methods of oversight and accountability. 15 The increasingly fervent collection of data
on migrant populations has been criticized for its potential to cause significant privacy
breaches and human rights concerns. 16
11. History provides many examples of the discriminatory and even deadly use of
data collection from marginalized groups. Nazi Germany strategically collected vast
amounts of data on Jewish communities to facilitate the Holocaust, largely in
partnership with a private corporation: IBM. 17 Other genocides also relied on
systematic tracking of groups, such as the Tutsi registries based on ethnicity identity
cards, which facilitated the magnitude of the Rwandan genocide in 1994. 18 Post 9–11,
the United States experimented with various modes of data collection on marginalized
populations through the Department of Homeland Security’s National Security Entry Exit Registration System, which collected photographs, biometrics, and even first person interview data from over 84,000 flagged individuals coming from mostly Arab
States. 19 In all of these cases, different actors, including governments, exploited ideas
about the neutrality or non-prejudicial necessity of data collection from marginalized
groups to then target those groups on a discriminatory basis.
12. Autonomous technologies are also increasingly used in monitoring and securing
border spaces. For example, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex)
has been testing various unpiloted military-grade drones in the Mediterranean and
Aegean Seas for the surveillance and interdiction of vessels of migrants and refugees
hoping to reach European shores. 20 A joint investigation by Bellingcat, Lighthouse
Reports, Der Spiegel, TV Asahi and Report Mainz produced credible evidence in
October 2020 that Frontex had been complicit in pushbacks, 21 or the forced returns of
refugees and migrants over a border without consideration of individual
circumstances and without the possibility to apply for asylum or appeal. Such
pushbacks likely violate non-refoulement obligations under international law, and are
aided by surveillance technologies. One submission highlighted legal developments
in Greece that permit the police to use drone surv eillance to monitor irregular
__________________
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
20-14872
See www.technologyreview.com/2018/10/22/139639/amazon-is-the-invisible-backbone-behindices-immigration-crackdown/.
See www.devex.com/news/opinion-the-wfp-and-palantir-controversy-should-be-a-wake-up-callfor-humanitarian-community-94307.
Dragana Kaurin, “Data protection and digital agency for refugees”, World Refugee Council
research paper No. 12 (May 2019), available at www.cigionline.org/publications/data-protectionand-digital-agency-refugees.
See www.chathamhouse.org/2018/03/beware-notion-better-data-lead-better-outcomes-refugeesand-migrants.
Edwin Black, IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance between Nazi Germany and
America’s Most Powerful Corporation (Dialog Press, 2012).
See www.theengineroom.org/dangerous-data-the-role-of-data-collection-in-genocides/.
See www.aclu.org/issues/immigrants-rights/immigrants-rights-and-detention/national-securityentry-exit-registration.
Petra Molnar, “Technological testing grounds: migration management experim ents and
reflections from the ground up” (November 2020).
See www.bellingcat.com/news/2020/10/23/frontex-at-fault-european-border-force-complicit-inillegal-pushbacks and www.spiegel.de/international/europe/eu-border-agency-frontex-complicitin-greek-refugee-pushback-campaign-a-4b6cba29-35a3-4d8c-a49f-a12daad450d7.
7/25