96 expenses, the Court is requested to make a determination of the amount of such costs and expenses in equity; and q) Regarding the handling of the case before the Inter-American Court, the Tierraviva organization incurred in expenses related to the proceedings carried out in during the time allowed to produce evidence amounting to US $ 4,638 (four thousand six hundred and thirty-eight United States Dollars) which are backed by documentary evidence. Allegations by the State 203. As regards to reparations, the State alleged that: As regards to the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages: a) The damages that might have been caused in the instant case have not been claimed before the Courts of Justice of the State, and there is no relationship between the deaths of some of the members of the Community and the ancestral lands issue; b) The State acknowledges the need of the members of the Community to generate a productive yield out of the lands to be made over to them in order to cater for the needs of the Community and to allow the adequate development of such lands. To such effect, the State will implement a project for the adequate development of such lands; As regards to the other forms of reparation: c) The State intends to make over, for no consideration, a certain extension of land to the Sawhoyamaxa Community, as provided in the Constitution and in the statutes in force; d) The State accepts the claim to set up a fund for the payment of the lands at the price determined by bargaining and the customary offer conditions; e) The State accepts the request for the establishment of a health care center, a school, and the provision of drinking water and sanitation facilities for the Community; f) The State accepts the claim for medical care and educational services for the Community, pursuant to the educational and health plans contemplated by the State; g) The State accepts the claim for the enactment and enforcement of legislation contemplating an effective and expedient remedy to solve conflicts of rights as those at issue in the instant case; h) The State does not object to making a public recognition, provided the representatives define the characteristics of the claim that they put forth; and