5 February 16, 2006, to submit their final written arguments concerning the merits and possibly reparations and legal costs. 19. On January 19, 2006, Mr. Andrew Paul Leake forwarded his expert report in the form of an affidavit, in compliance with the Order of the President of December 21, 2005 (supra para. 18). The report was filed in English. On January 20, 2006, the representatives submitted the Spanish translation of the expert opinion by Andrew Paul Leake, which was rendered by affidavit by Tito Ulises Lahaye-Díaz on January 25, 2006. 20. On January 18, 2006, the State submitted the affidavits by witness Oscar Centurión and expert witness Augusto Fogel, attested by a notary public. Likewise, on January 19, 2006, the representatives submitted the notarized expert opinions of José Marcelo Brustein and Pablo Balmaceda-Rodríguez, and the notarized testimonies of Carlos Marecos-Aponte, Leonardo González, Gladys Benítez, Mariana Ayala and Elsa Ayala, in compliance with the President's Order of December 21, 2005 (supra para. 18). Likewise, the representatives requested an extension of the term for submittting Martín Sanneman’s testimony, and made comments on the affidavits by Bernardo Jacquet and César Escobar-Catebecke, added to the body of evidence in the instant case under the Order of the President of December 21, 2005 (supra. para. 18). On January 20, 2006, the Inter-American Commission submitted a communication, whereby it endorsed the affidavits of witnesses Carlos MarecosAponte, Leonardo González, Gladys Benítez, Mariana Ayala and Elsa Ayala, and expert witnesses Pablo Balmaceda-Rodríguez and José Marcelo Brunstein, and submitted its comments on the expert opinions by Bernardo Jackquet and César Escobar-Catebecke. 21. On January 20, 2006, following instructions given by the President and considering the extraordinary nature of the case brought by the representatives, the Secretariat granted a non-postponable delay ending on February 6, 2006 for submitting Martín Sanneman’s affidavit (supra para. 18). Finally, on February 8, 2006, the representatives submitted Martín Sanneman’s affidavit. 22. On January 20, 2006, following instructions given by the President, the Secretariat required the State and the representatives, pursuant to Article 45(2) of the Rules of Procedure, to submit, as evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case, (a) birth and death certificates, autopsy records and any other relevant documents that may show the causes of the alleged deaths of the members of the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community mentioned by the representatives of the alleged victims, to wit: “[NN] Galarza, Rosana López, Eduardo Cáceres, Eulalio Cáceres, Esteban González, NN González-Aponte, Wilfrido González, Teresio González, NN Yegros, Antonio Alvarenga, Jenny Toledo, Guido Ruiz-Diaz, (NN) González, Luis Torres-Chávez, Derlis Armando Torres, (NN) Torres, Lucía Aponte, Marcos Chávez, Juan Ramón González, Pedro Fernández, Eusebio Ayala, Francisca Britez [and] Diego Andrés Ayala”, and (b) the medical histories, certificates of medical care, or any other document evidencing whether the above-mentioned individuals received any kind of medical care in any field of specialization, at any hospital, clinic, health care center or any health care facility, within six months prior to the alleged deaths. Likewise, following instructions given by the President, the Secretariat required the State to submit, as evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case, a detailed report on the alleged medical and food assistance given by any governmental entity to the members of the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community from the effective date of Executive Order No. 3,789 of June 23, 1999 to date.