the expense of communities and their issues. This is currently the case of the minorities in Iraq. These human populations agree among themselves which individuals will be provided to become the means of planning and building state institutions. Unfortunately, the practical reality of these means is that they become the first to turn a blind eye to legal norms, [even though] they might have personally participated in putting them in place. Thus, they prefer to circumvent them (legal rules) in any way for personal gains, including the twisted ones with the aim to increase personal and sectarian gains. Due to the normalization of the political culture of corruption and its dissemination through themselves, transmitting the infection to institutions of the state by imposing themselves, their relatives and their followers as representatives of the people in various institutions to secure their way. The strange thing about this state of affairs is that the regimes clearly pursue it, and especially in the states described as developing. Often they are not confronted with any constraint by the mentioned regulatory bodies. Not only [that], even if they were confronted with some constraints by the regulatory bodies, there are agreements, normalization and compliance that happen between operants in official decisions as is the case with the sorting of the elections’ results in Iraq for example. Nobody denies systematic fraud, which is an affront and [means] engaging in the ugliest flagrant violations of the opinion of the people through the ballot box, which can cost them their lives because of the heightened danger surrounding them on their way to it. This leads to an adoption of what is prohibited by laws and required by the supervisory [authority] and justice. Days and years go by and the negative developments alter the ‘contexts’ considered acceptable not only in political, executive and legislative circles, but also in the judicial circle, whose duty it is to interpret the laws for the benefit of the public interest and not for the benefit of a specific authority. However, this state of affairs is not only caused by the deteriorating security situation and the continued targeting of judges and lawyers, but also by the existence of a part of the prevailing cultural heritage and promoting the dominant religious bias, which encourages biased scaling and alignment as a result of pressure exercised by armed partisan actors. The solution here might be a direct international supervision imposed by the international community more effectively than is the case now. These levels of protection tools were created for the protection of rights and not for their violation by the presence of security forces. Unfortunately, it is what we see today. On all these levels, especially at the national level there are blatant violations and most of them pass without any punishment of those in charge. This leads to their recurrence. The causes leading to the continuing violations throughout history are numerous despite the many means to avoid and fix them.