million people, around 1.5 million Anatolian Greeks and 500,000
Muslims in Greece.(see also the exchange of Greek and Turkish
Populations, Advisory Opinion of the Permanent Court of
International Justice, 1925).
In other instances, minorities were either dispersed or over layered
with other populations, and sometimes territories inhabited by
minorities were ceded or 'transferred' to undermine minority
consciousness. During the Second World War, these techniques
changed to crude methods involving extermination of minorities by
genocide and forcible transfer of populations, including the
implantation of settlers.
While the events of the First World War led to the development of
Minority treaties as a specialized regime for protecting minorities, the
forerunner to the modern concept of human rights, the Second World
War led to the development of an inclusive regime of protection,
inclusive of minorities, anchored in human rights flowing from the
UN Charter, and the 1949 Geneva Conventions concerning
international humanitarian law.
The sad experience of forcible transfer of populations during the
Second World War prompted the prohibition, with certain exceptions,
in the 4th Geneva Convention of forcible population transfer and
implantation of settlers in Occupied Territories. Forcible transfer of
populations also became a grave breach of international humanitarian
law. The modern concept of displacement at least in the context of
armed conflict has its origins in the forcible transfer of populations,
which affected minorities in particular. As part of this development,
in 1977, Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions made
explicit, again with certain exceptions, the prohibition of
displacement for reasons related to the conflict in internal armed
conflicts.
It is this background that informs the situation of minorities in
humanitarian crises from the perspective of displacement. As general
as a context that may be, this discussion paper itself is limited to the