CYPRUS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 99 7. Holds unanimously that no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 has been established by reason of an alleged administrative practice, including an alleged practice of failing to secure enjoyment of their possessions in southern Cyprus to Turkish Cypriots living in northern Cyprus (paragraph 377); 8. Holds by eleven votes to six that no violation of Article 13 of the Convention has been established by reason of an alleged practice of failing to secure effective remedies to Turkish Cypriots living in northern Cyprus (paragraph 383). VII. ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF OTHER ARTICLES OF THE CONVENTION Holds unanimously that it is not necessary to examine separately the applicant Government's complaints under Articles 1, 17, 18 and former Article 32 § 4 of the Convention (paragraph 388). VIII. THE ISSUE OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION Holds unanimously that the issue of the possible application of Article 41 of the Convention is not ready for decision and adjourns consideration thereof. Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 10 May 2001. Luzius WILDHABER President Michele DE SALVIA Registrar In accordance with Article 45 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 74 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are annexed to this judgment: (a) partly dissenting opinion of Mrs Palm joined by Mr Jungwiert, Mr Levits, Mr Panţîru, Mr Kovler and Mr Marcus-Helmons; (b) partly dissenting opinion of Mr Costa; (c) partly dissenting opinion of Mr Fuad;