In December 2000, a bill on the Recognition of Freedom of Conscience and Ideas was presented. It was drafted by myself, which addressed in particular and contemplated the right of peoples and groups of being exempted of fulfilling a normative mandate invocating their beliefs, for instance, both in the work environment (case of Sabbat and other days of religious precept), civic duties (case of pledging allegiance to patriotic symbols), health sector (exception of making any practice against moral or religious conscience), or regarding the animal ritual killings. Basically, they referred to the dramatic precise moment in which a person or a group face between denying their faith or (which is the most important for them) or violating a law, when is possible, even though is more difficult, to look for a reasonable adaptation, between harmonising the interests at stake allowing to safeguard the freedom without any detrimental of state laws. The following year, the representatives of the religious faiths were invited to the seminar “Parliamentary Workshop on Freedom of Conscience”, celebrated in the House of Representatives, in which the legislators of the political parties defined and promoted the approval of the project, followed by academics who represented different religions present in society, clarifying the juridical suitability of the bill. After this event, the representative of the different religions argued to the drafted of the project to build a momentum for the bill, in which during the parliamentarian discussion was left to be discussed by the Human Rights House of representatives. Thus, an “Interfaith Commission” was created, which reunited in person or online several times, and repeated the request for a hearing to the Human Rights Commission of the House of Representatives. In this hearing each one had the opportunity to raise their faith motivations to support the initiative, followed by the juridical justification signalling de adequacy of the bill to become law. The project is oblivious to economic and political-partisan issues. The is not any financial cost. It is a modest request due to its aims and to those pushing for it. It does not introduce a big constitutional reform. But it enshrines and protects the highest values, and at the same time, the simplest, those of the everyday, the most sacred of human beings: their conscience and the possibility to drive their lives according to them, within the national law. It is a call for securing the freedoms of those supporting the bases of our society, such as the promotion of the freedom of civil and faith liberty in all its imaginable extension. It was not forgotten the crucial management of the Jewish-Christian Brotherhood of Uruguay (CJC), which since 1958 has been astonishing, hardening and reaping the benefits of the interfaith dialogue which is its main driver. In fact, the CJC in Uruguay, first of the Americas, was founded by a Methodist priest Emilio Castro, a Chief Rabi Frtiz Winter, uncle of Rafael Winter who participates in this encounter, and of the catholic priest – Jesuit, Priest Justo Asiaín, my uncle. As of today, the project was practically buried, being witness of the only factor that accomplished reuniting the faith and willing of a myriad of religious faiths of the country – minority and majority –, claiming since the beginning the silence to fulfil its duty as guardian of fundamental rights. This