Therefore, it is necessary to recommend a greater representation of minorities in the system of justice through the policy of racial quotas. In this same manner, it is necessary to recommend greater access for minorities to justice by expanding free legal assistance. The Forum must also recommend the democratization and independence of judicial power, allowing for social control and the suppression of the rigid hierarchy of the magisterial career. Currently, in Brazil, the tribunal judges have ample powers to designate judges. There are many cases of judges transferred to other work positions by the presidents of tribunals because they decide in a contrary manner against the incarceration of minorities. It is necessary to recommend the diffusion of human rights in law schools, which currently prioritize the teaching and learning of commercial rights. This diffusion should also reach the professionals of the system of justice because the application of norms requires taking into consideration the multicultural character of the society in which we live. Therefore, I satisfactorily adopt the recent agreement by the National Council of Justice with the Inter American Commission of Human Rights to promote human rights in the judicial powers. All these recommendations that I suggested have as an objective guaranteeing the independence, impartiality, and better representation in the justice system: that is to say humanize the system. Nonetheless, I remember that there are already good practices and mechanisms to prevent the abuse of minorities. These should therefore be expanded. I highlight the implementation of a custody hearing that would allow for the prompt representation of those detained in friganti to the judge, faster release of individuals, and the verification of the practice of torture. It is necessary to widen this act for all prison cases. I also cite the program of Community Justice of the Tribunal of the Federal District in the community of Ceilândia, whose objective is the reduction of violence. The program allows for the resolution of conflicts inside communities. It is a case of participative justice based on a human rights education and in the mediation by the community which facilitates communication between people in conflict and in the transformation of conflict into an opportunity to mobilize the community. I highlight as well the creation of the Indigenous Hub for Mediation and Conciliation in the Matutuca community. The State conceded the possibility for leaders to resolve internal conflicts with their knowledge and norms. It is necessary to recommend the creation of new hubs that legitimize traditional knowledge, including in the indigenous zones where the State does not fulfill its obligation of demarcating lands.