A/HRC/16/53/Add.1 where available the results, of any investigation, medical examinations, and judicial or other inquiries whichmay have been carried out in relation to this case. (b) No response received from the Government (c) Observations by the Special Rapporteur 176. The Special Rapporteur regrets that he has so far not received a reply from the Government of India concerning the above mentioned allegations. He would also like to recall the rights of the above-mentioned MFI members to all their human rights, including freedom of religion or belief, in accordance with the articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, among other standards. The General Assembly, in its resolution 64/164, urges States to step up their efforts to protect and promote freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief, and to this end “to ensure that no one is discriminated against on the basis of his or her religion or belief when accessing, inter alia, […] medical care […]”. He would like to take the opportunity to refer to his predecessor’s thematic report to the General Assembly on the situation of refugees, asylum-seekers and internally displaced persons (see A/62/280, paras. 38-63). 3. Communication sent on 5 November 2010 as a follow-up to the Special Rapporteur’s country visit to India in March 2008 177. In a follow-up letter of 5 November 2010, the Special Rapporteur reiterated his appreciation for the cooperation of the Government in relation to his predecessor’s visit to India from 3 February to 20 March 2008. He emphasized that follow-up to country reports was of central importance to the cooperation and dialogue between mandate holders and States. Referring to the report to the Human Rights Council (A/HRC/13/40, para. 15), the Special Rapporteur indicated that the mandate has re-established the initial approach of sending follow-up letters after visits in order to receive updated information about the implementation of the recommendations at the national level. 178. For ease of reference, the Special Rapporteur transmitted a table containing the conclusions and recommendations in the related mission report (A/HRC/10/8/Add.3) as well as follow-up information from relevant United Nations documents, including from the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review, Special Procedures and Treaty Bodies. 179. The Special Rapporteur asked the Government to provide him with updated information on the consideration given to these recommendations, the steps taken to implement them, and any constraints which may prevent their implementation. This table, including any information provided by the Government, is available online on the Special Rapporteur’s website (www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/religion/visits.htm). J. Iran (Islamic Republic of) 1. Urgent appeal sent on 5 May 2010 jointly with the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief; and the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (a) Allegations transmitted to the Government 180. The Special Procedures mandate holders brought to the attention of the Government information regarding Ayatollah Sayed Hossein Kazemeyni Boroujerdi, Iranian citizen, 37